Attribute Importance Weights in Conjoint Analysis: Bias and Pr

نویسنده

  • Donald E Stem
چکیده

ATTRIBUTE IMPORTANCE WEIGHTS IN CONJOINT ANALYSIS: BIAS AND PRECISION Sanjay Mishra, Washington State University U. N. Umesh, Washington State University Donald E. Stem, Jr., Washington State University ABSTRACT Consumer researchers have used conjoint analysis to evaluate the importance of an attribute in forming preferences. Although past researchers have tested the validity and reliability of the overall conjoint analysis results, some of the properties of the individual importance weights have remained unknown. Using a simulation, the current paper estimates the bias and precision of the importance weights. The bias and precision are each found to vary as a function of the estimation algorithm, judgmental error level, evaluation strategy used, number of profiles and attributes in the evaluation task and the number of attribute levels. When the dominant attribute evaluation strategy is used, the estimates of the importance weights have large biases and poor precision.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Investigation of Customer Priorities for Machine Made Carpet Through Conjoint and Cluster Analysis (Case Study in Yazd, Iran)

The machine made carpet industry is one of the main and most famous industries in Iran and especially in the city of Yazd. However there is little information about customer preferences for different attributes of this product. In this article we tried to estimate the relative importance of the main attributes affecting customer desire for purchasing machine made carpet and the utility values f...

متن کامل

The use of multi-criteria decision analysis weight elicitation techniques in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE To test the applicability of multi-criteria decision analysis preference elicitation techniques in cognitively impaired individuals. METHOD A convenience sample of 16 cognitively impaired subjects and 12 healthy controls was asked to participate in a small pilot study. The subjects determined the relative importance of four decision criteria using five different weight elicitation t...

متن کامل

Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees

Our experiment shows that the division of attributes in value trees can either increase or decrease the weight of an attribute. The structural variation of value trees may also change the rank of attributes. We propose that our new ®ndings related to the splitting bias, some other phenomena appearing with attribute weighting in value trees, and the number-of-attribute-levels e€ect in conjoint a...

متن کامل

Bridging Designs for Conjoint Analysis: The Issue of Attribute Importance

Conjoint analysis studies involving many attributes and attribute levels often occur in practice. Because such studies can cause respondent fatigue and lack of cooperation, it is important to design data collection tasks that reduce those problems. Bridging designs, incorporating two or more task subsets with overlapping attributes, can presumably lower task difficulty in such cases. In this pa...

متن کامل

Assessing patient preferences in heart failure using conjoint methodology

AIM The course of heart failure (HF) is characterized by frequent hospitalizations, a high mortality rate, as well as a severely impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To optimize disease management, understanding of patient preferences is crucial. We aimed to assess patient preferences using conjoint methodology and HRQoL in patients with HF. METHODS Two modules were applied: an in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001